EMILIO MAS, INDIVIDUALLY, AND SIMON AMADOR AND ISABEL AMADOR, AS HUSBAND AND WIFE, APPELLANTS,
v.
METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, NORBERTO REYES AND THERON MCCLAIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court reviewed a decree of annulment granted to a husband, where the wife had initially sued for divorce and later counterclaimed for separate maintenance, and the trial court expressed doubt about the divorce proof before granting annulment.
The appellate court reviewed the annulment decree, noting the trial court's doubt regarding the divorce proof and the lack of disposition on the wife's counterclaim.
A husband sued for divorce, attaching a pre-nuptial agreement. The wife counterclaimed for separate maintenance. The trial court, doubting the divorce…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the summary judgment in the County’s favor on plaintiffs’ false arrest/false imprisonment claims. “The record clearly shows, without material dispute, that the police officers had probable cause to arrest [plaintiffs].” Medard v. Miami-Dade County, 769 So. 2d 1127,1127 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Bolanos v. Metropolitan Dade County, 677 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). “Since probable cause is a complete bar to an action for false arrest and false imprisonment, summary judgment was properly entered in the County’s favor.” Bolanos, 677 So. 2d at 1005 (citations omitted).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fils v. City of Aventura, 768 F. Supp. 2d 1188 (S.D. Fla. 2010)
Authorities Cited
- Mireya Bolanos v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 677 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
- Otero v. State, 769 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)