GLENN E. CAMPBELL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the revocation of probation and sentencing but remanded for entry of written orders of revocation.
Appellant was adjudicated guilty for violation of probation in six prosecutions and for burglary, grand theft, and possession of burglary tools in two…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders V. California cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal by Glenn E. Campbell from his adjudications of guilt for violation of probation in six 1996 prosecutions and his adjudications of guilt following an open plea to burglary of a dwelling, grand theft and possession of burglary tools in two 1998 prosecutions. His concurrent sentences totaled 30 years.
Appellant’s assistant public defender filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and supporting brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). The state has no objection to the motion.
Our review of the briefs and entire record on appeal leads us to conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit which could be advanced on appellant’s behalf. However, the trial court failed to reduce its findings of revocation of probation to writing. We therefore affirm the revocation of probation and resulting sentencing, but remand for entry of written orders of revocation specifying the conditions appellant violated. See, e.g., Walker v.. State, 710 So. 2d 747 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Watts v. State, 688 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Taylor v. State, 681 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Glendon v. State, 669 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
AFFIRMED, but REMANDED.
WARNER, C.J., GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (14 total)
-
Ira C. King, III v. State, 46 So. 3d 1171 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)…ific conditions of probation that were violated. See Delisa v. State, 910 So. 2d 418, 421 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Defontes v. State, 889 So. 2d 217, 217 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Anderson v. State, 879 So. 2d 688, 688 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Campbell v. State, 776 So. 2d 1036, 1037 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Because the order of revocation of probation here does not specify the conditions defendant violated, we remand for the trial court to amend the order to include the conditions that the court found were violated at defenda…
-
Riley v. State, 884 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)…court disposition sheet. Therefore, we affirm the revocation of probation and resulting sentence, but remand for entry of a written order revoking probation and specifying which conditions appellant was found to have violated. See Campbell v. State, 776 So. 2d 1036, 1037 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Walker v. State, 710 So. 2d 747, 747 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). AFFIRMED, but REMANDED. STONE, WARNER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.…
-
REY v. State, 904 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…or entry of a written order of revocation of probation specifying the conditions appellant was found to have violated. See Riley v. State, 884 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), Anderson v. State, 879 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), Campbell v. State, 776 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). As to appellant’s argument that his scoresheet erroneously added points for legal status, we find no objection in the record and conclude that the claim must be collaterally challenged. Williams v. State, 896 So. 2d 812 (Fla.…
Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Watts v. State, 688 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
- Ferguson v. State, 669 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
- Ill. Farmers Ins. Co. v. Doyle, 681 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
- Ellis v. State, 681 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
- Burgess v. State, 710 So. 2d 747 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)