FRANKLIN E. VALDEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
W & E TRADING CORP., APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2001-01-31
No. 3D00-1116
Before COPE, GERSTEN and GREEN, JJ.
777 So. 2d 1130 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Franklin E. Valdez appeals an adverse final judgment after jury trial. We conclude that the evidence in the case was subject to conflicting interpretations and the case was properly submitted to the jury. We see no error in the denial of the appellant’s motions for directed verdict and new trial. See Jones v. Airport Rent-A-Car, Inc., 342 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Levine v. Frank, 311 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Evans Tires & Treads, Inc. v. Moller, 793 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Valdez v. W & E Trading Corp., 777 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Easton-Babcock & Associates, Inc. v. Fernandez, 706 So. 2d 916 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); [*69] Wilkes v. Florida Supermarkets, Inc., 619 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw