LILLIE SIKES WORRELL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
MRS. A. W. MILLER (FORMERLY MRS. A. W. MCGLASHAN) FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF M. ELLEN FORD, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's judgment in a case that had been appealed twice before. The court found no errors in the judgment, referencing its prior opinions on the controlling law.
The Florida Supreme Court held that there were no errors in the judgment of the Circuit Court. Therefore, the judgment was affirmed.
“This case is here on writ of error the second time.”
Establishes the procedural history of the case being a repeat appeal.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThis case represents the second time the matter has been before the Florida Supreme Court on a writ of error. The previous appeal resulted in a revers…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Writ Of Error cases and more on FLexlaw
Pee Curiam.
This case is here on writ of error the second time.
The controlling law applicable to the case was embraced in the opinions delivered when the case was before this Court on a former writ of error where there was a judgment for plaintiff which was reversed by this Court. Worrell v. Ford, 91 Fla. 44, 109 Sou. 440.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.