JAMES G. MCMILLAN, APPELLANT,
v.
J. D. JOHNSON, APPELLEE

Fla. | 1931-01-12
Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur., Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.
100 Fla. 1702 Florida Supreme Court (1931)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's order, finding no errors in the proceedings. The court's decision was based on its review of the record, briefs, and arguments presented.


Holding

The Florida Supreme Court held that there were no errors in the circuit court's order.


Key Quotes

“It is therefore considered, ordered, and decreed by the Court that the said order of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed”

This quote directly states the court's holding and disposition.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

This case involves an appeal from an order of the circuit court. The specific facts leading to the order are not detailed in the opinion. The appellat…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order. It is therefore considered, ordered, and decreed by the Court that the said order of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed under authority of Willys-Overland, Inc. v. Blake, 97 Fla. 626, 121 So. R. 884; Feinberg v. Stearns, 56 Fla. 279, 47 So. R. 797, 131 Am. St. R. 119; Hunter v. State Bank of Florida, 65 Fla. 202, 61 So. R. 497.

*1703Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw