JUAN A. ROBAINA, AND S.F.C. INVESTMENTS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,
v.
GRAN CENTRAL CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiffs, as purchasers, sued the defendants, as sellers, upon a land sale contract seeking a) specific performance, b) damages for breach of contract, and c) damages for unjust enrichment. After hearing oral argument on defendants’ motion for summary judgment, the trial court entered final judgment for the sellers, from which the buyers appeal. We find that there are triable issues of fact with respect to the claimed oral modification of the written agreement. Additionally, there are most certainly triable issues of fact with respect to unjust enrichment claim. For these reasons, summary judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ruberg v. Ruberg, 858 So. 2d 1147 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)…riodic alimony is awarded. The presence of special circumstances is thus required to establish that the provision of life insurance or other security is “necessary to protect [the] award of alimony” under section 61.08(3). See also Lapham v. Lapham, 778 So. 2d 487, 489 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (stating that life insurance requirement or other security “is not required or automatic ... [but] ‘it is [instead] justified only if there is a demonstrated need to protect the alimony recipient’ ”) (citation omitted). Such…
-
Alpha v. Alpha, 885 So. 2d 1023 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)…003); Pinion v. Pinion, 818 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Guerin v. DiRoma, 819 So. 2d 968 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); McDaniel v. McDaniel, 653 So. 2d 1076 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Frechter v. Frechter, 548 So. 2d 712 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). . Lapham v. Lapham, 778 So. 2d 487 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Richardson v. Richardson, 722 So. 2d 280 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). . Moorehead v. Moorehead, 745 So. 2d 549 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). . Hill v. Hooten, 776 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). . See Parker v. Parker, 655 So. 2d 233 (Fla. 1…
-
Engesser v. Engesser, 42 So. 3d 249 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)…dered the following marriages in the "gray” area. See Layeni v. Layeni, 843 So. 2d 295, 303 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (stating that seven plus years falls into the "gray” area where there is no presumption for or against alimony awards); Lapham v. Lapham, 778 So. 2d 487 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (holding that seven-year marriage falls into gray area); see also Segall v. Segall, 708 So. 2d 983 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (finding eight-year marriage falls into gray area); Bailey v. Bailey, 617 So. 2d 815 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (stati…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence