PABLO SEGON, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Naveira, 873 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 2004)
  …e cases on which the dissent relies, see dissenting op. at 314-15, charged a continuance to the State precisely because the [*307] State had provided discovery either late or not at all. In fact, two of the cases cited by the dissent, Vega v. State, 778 So. 2d 505, 506 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), and Lobik v. State, 506 So. 2d 1077, 1079 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), rely on State v. Del Gaudio, 445 So. 2d 605 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), where the court emphasized that “prejudice to the defendant is irrelevant where the State is not o…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• State v. Baldwin, 978 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)
  …g.1 It was proper for the trial court to consider whether the defense had been given sufficient time to prepare for the cross-examination of these witnesses, particularly because Respondent had invoked his right to a speedy trial. See Vega v. State, 778 So. 2d 505, 506 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(“A de [*809] fendant should not have to choose between the right to a speedy trial and the right to discovery within sufficient time to adequately prepare for trialHowever, this consideration did not eliminate the need for th…
• Pura v. State, 789 So. 2d 436 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
  …epare for trial without forfeiting the right to a speedy trial, and if the State fails to do so, the court may charge a continuance against the State, even if it results in dismissal of the charges for speedy trial violation. See also Vega v. State, 778 So. 2d 505 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2001) (defendant should not have to choose between the right to speedy trial and the right to discovery within sufficient time to adequately prepare for trial). In State v. Anderson, 781 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), the defendant’s…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Hernandez, 658 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)