BENJAMIN DELASHMUTT, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Roque v. Paskow, 812 So. 2d 500 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
  …ew benefit for one party. See Dickinson v. Dickinson, 746 So. 2d 1253, 1254 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). On the other hand, a clarification does not seek to change rights and obligations but to make a judgment more clear and precise. See Fussell v. Fussell, 778 So. 2d 517, 518 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Finally, the construction of a final judgment presents a question of law for the court, see Boynton v. Canal Auth., 311 So. 2d 412, 415 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), and we may review it de novo on appeal. As we read the original f…
• Pomeranz v. Ina T. Pomeranz, 961 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
  …eks a new benefit for one party. Dickinson v. Dickinson, 746 So. 2d 1253, 1254 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). On the other hand, a clarification does not seek to change rights and obligations, but to make a judgment more clear and precise. Fussell v. Fussell, 778 So. 2d 517, 518 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). In order for the trial court to modify a final judgment, the moving party must present the issue by appropriate pleadings. McDonald v. McDonald, 732 So. 2d 505, 506 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). To obtain modification, a party must…
• Grasso v. Mulholland, 835 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
  …ase, it appears to us that the court was, in essence, interpreting and clarifying the parties’ agreement, incorporated into the decree of dissolution, with regard to the parties’ visitation schedule with their three children. See Fussell v. Fussell, 778 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Roque v. Paskow, 812 So. 2d 500 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Dickinson v. Dickinson, 746 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). The trial court found that the provision in the settlement that the former husband have not “less than” the times…

Authorities Cited

• Gissendanner v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1979)
• Robinson v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1979)
• Leonard v. State, 760 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 2000)