DEMETRIUS BROWN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial court did not err in allowing the State to introduce admissions made in a sworn pretrial motion to dismiss.
Defendant was convicted of drug offenses after a second trial, where admissions made in a prior sworn motion to dismiss were admitted into evidence. T…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Corpus Delicti cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from judgments of conviction for possession of cocaine and possession of marijuana with the intent to sell both within 1,000 feet of a public school. We affirm.
Defendant’s first trial on these charges ended in a deadlocked jury and a mistrial. Before that first trial, defendant had filed a sworn motion to dismiss, making certain admissions as to the facts charged in the information and alleging that the State would be unable to prove that the “objects” he was allegedly seen exchanging were, or contained, illegal narcotics.
In the second trial, the court allowed the State to introduce the admissions the defendant made in that earlier pretrial sworn motion to dismiss, provided that the State first prove the corpus delicti of the crime charged. The motion was not read, but it was submitted to the jury as evidence. The admissions had not been allowed into evidence in the first trial only because the state had attempted to introduce the admissions in the middle of the trial, without notice to the defendant of its intent to use the admissions. The jury returned a verdict of guilty; defendant appeals.
The record shows that the state established the corpus delicti. See State v. Wallace, 734 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). The facts averred in the motion to dismiss were not the sole bases for conviction. State v. Palmore, 510 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Garmon v. State, 772 So. 2d 43 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). In fact, all facts the defendant admitted in the motion were brought forward by witnesses at the second trial.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Garmon v. State, 772 So. 2d 43 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
- State v. Rickie Lee Palmore, 510 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
- Hamilton v. State, 734 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)