WILLIE D. MCCUNE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1999-03-05
Nos. 98-04504, 98-04514
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ„ Concur.
779 So. 2d 296 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1999) Negative Treatment
Cited by 17 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Willie McCune appeals the denial of his motions for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.800 and 3.850. McCune filed three virtually identical, successive motions alleging that he had not received all of the jail time credit to which he was entitled. These resulted in two appeals which have been consolidated here.

The trial court denied the first two motions on the grounds that they were time-barred under rule 3.850. This decision would have required reversal as McCune stated a facially sufficient claim for relief under rule 3.800(a) which could be brought at any time. However, in addressing McCune’s third motion, the trial court reviewed it on its merits and denied it with attachments which refuted McCune’s claim that he was entitled to more jail time credit than he had received. Therefore, we affirm.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ„ Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …ose in section 95.031(2)(b) are analogous to statutes of limitations that operate as affirmative defenses. An error concerning the trial court’s ruling on an affirmative defense can be corrected on appeal from a final order. See Panagakos v. Laufer, 779 So. 2d 296 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). As such, Petitioners fail to demonstrate irreparable harm that cannot be remedied on appeal. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, the petitions for writ of certiorari are DENIED. KAHN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur. . Public Law…
  • Allan & Conrad, Inc. v. Univ. OF Cent. Fla., 961 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)
    …ogan has been implicitly overruled. We hold that prohibition is not available to review a trial court’s order that rejects an affirmative defense based on the statute of limitations. We find further support for our decision from Panagakos v. Laufer, 779 So. 2d 296 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). In Panagakos, the trial court had denied a motion to dismiss based on a statute of limitations defense. The petitioner sought review with the appellate court by a petition for writ of prohibition. The Second District Court of App…
  • Aurora Bank v. Cimbler, 166 So. 3d 921 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)
    …peal. See, e.g., Allstate Ins. Co. v. Langston, 655 So. 2d 91, 94 (Fla.1995). In order for us to issue a writ of prohibition, we must determine that the trial court is unlawfully acting in excess of its jurisdiction. See, e.g., Panagakos v. Laufer, 779 So. 2d 296, 297 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). III. Analysis A. Writ of Certiorari We begin our analysis by reciting the definition of mediation, found in Florida Rule for Certified and Court-Appointed Mediators 10.210: Mediation is the process whereby a neutral and…

Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw