RAY ANDERSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2000-05-05
No. 2D99-2382
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and FULMER, J., Concur.
779 So. 2d 370 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
STRINGER, Judge.

STRINGER, Judge.

Ray Neal Anderson challenges his judgment and sentence for felony driving while license suspended or revoked. We affirm Anderson’s judgment and sentence except that we remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error on Anderson’s written judgment. The judgment incorrectly reflects that Anderson pleaded nolo contendere when it should have reflected that he pleaded guilty.

Affirmed and remanded to correct scrivener’s error. CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and FULMER, J., Concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Clemann v. State (Fla. 2d DCA 2021)
    …orrectly specifies that Ms. Clemann entered a nolo contendere plea to both counts. The record reflects that she pleaded guilty to the counts at the plea hearing. Thus, we remand for the trial court to enter a corrected order. See Anderson v. State, 779 So. 2d 370, 370 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (affirming and remanding for entry of a corrected judgment where it incorrectly stated that defendant entered a nolo contendere plea). Ms. Clemann need not be present when the trial court corrects this scrivener's error. See…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw