WILLIE CULLEN TOWNSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sentencing Credit cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Willie C. Townson, challenges his judgment and sentences for trafficking in methamphetamine and sale of methamphetamine. We affirm, but remand with directions to the trial court to correct the written sentence to conform to the oral pronouncement. See Benjamin v. State, 752 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
In the present case, in circuit court case number 97-4059, the trial court orally sentenced appellant to thirty months in prison followed by five years’ probation. In circuit court case number 97-4060, the court orally sentenced appellant to five years’ probation to be served concurrently with the sentence imposed in case number 97-4059. The written sentence, however, reflects a sentence of thirty months’ prison followed by five years’ probation on case number 97-4060. On remand, the trial court shall correct this error in the written sentence. We also note that if appellant violates his probation and is sentenced to prison in case number 97-4060, he is entitled to credit on that case for any time spent in prison on case number 97-4059. See Tripp v. State, 622 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 1993).
Remanded with directions.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SALCINES, J„ and DANAHY, PAUL W., (Senior) Judge, Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Stanislaw Matajek v. Leokadia Skowronska, 927 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…lution. The Former Husband contends that the trial court erred by determining that his interest in the apartments was a marital asset. We find the trial court did not have jurisdiction to adjudicate property rights of non-parties. Minsky v. Minsky, 779 So. 2d 375, 377 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Schiller v. Schiller, 625 So. 2d 856 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Ray v. Ray, 624 So. 2d 1146, 1148 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). The trial court recognized this when acknowledging it could not make the son sign a mortgage to enforce the For…
-
Barabas v. Barabas, 923 So. 2d 588 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…ty and evenly divide the proceeds, or either party may seek a partition. The husband appeals. The court committed error because it lucked jurisdiction in the dissolution proceeding to adjudicate property rights of a nonrparty. See Minsky v. Minsky, 779 So. 2d 375, 377 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). The quitclaim from Ruth Barabas to the Husband is the document referenced in the i final judgment. The Husband contends that there was no evidence to support any conclusion except that he and his mother held title to the pr…
-
Ehman v. Ehman, 156 So. 3d 7 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)…is dissolution proceeding, and the trial court did not have the power or authority to transfer the property of a corporation without the join-der of that entity. See Mathes v. Mathes, 91 So. 3d 207, 208 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); see also Minsky v. Minsky, 779 So. 2d 375, 377 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (“In this dissolution action, the trial court does not have jurisdiction to adjudicate property rights of nonparties.”); cf. Austin v. Austin, 120 So. 3d 669, 674 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (“[A] trial court has the power to value a…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Tripp v. State, 622 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 1993)
- Benjamin v. State, 752 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)