EARNEST HARDY, III, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
EARNEST HARDY, III, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
779 So. 2d 396
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 41 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Earnest Hardy, III, appeals his judgments of conviction for offenses occurring on June 22, 1996, and the sentences imposed under the 1995 sentencing guidelines. We affirm the convictions without further discussion.
However, the supreme court recently announced that chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, violated the single-subject provision of article III, section 6, of the Florida Constitution. See Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla.2000). We, therefore, remand this case to the trial court to reconsider the sentences. See Smith v. State, 761 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., GREEN, and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (21 total)
-
Ginnifer GEE v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 72 So. 3d 211 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)…94, 895 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967). Mortgage foreclosures are equitable proceedings in which opportunities to try to reform instruments to reflect their true intent should be permitted if not encouraged. Huntington Nat'l Bank v. Merrill Lynch Credit Corp., 779 So. 2d 396, 398 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Trs. of C.I. Mortg. Group v. City Hous. Corp., 422 So. 2d 323, 324 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Notwithstanding, U.S. Bank was still required to state with particularity that its summary judgment motion was based on this ground. The…
-
LoBELLO v. State Farm Fla. Ins. Co., 152 So. 3d 595 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)…(Fla.2000). Summary judgment is proper only if (1) no genuine issue of material fact exists, viewing every possible inference in favor of the party against whom summary judgment has been entered, Huntington Nat’l Bank v. Merrill Lynch Credit Corp., 779 So. 2d 396, 398 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), and (2) the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law, Aberdeen at Ormond Beach, 760 So. 2d at 130. “If the record reflects the existence of any genuine issue of material fact or the possibility of any issue,…
-
Armiger v. Associated Outdoor Clubs, Inc., 48 So. 3d 864 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)…(Fla.2000). Summary judgment is proper only if (1) no genuine issue of material fact exists, viewing every possible inference in favor of the party against whom summary judgment has been entered, Huntington Nat’l Bank v. Merrill Lynch Credit Corp., 779 So. 2d 396, 398 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), and (2) the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law, Aberdeen at Ormond Beach, 760 So. 2d at 130. “If the record reflects the existence of any genuine issue of material fact or the possibility of any issue,…
Previewing 3 of 21 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 2000)
- Smith v. State, 761 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)