STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
DARREN JEROME GOODE, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2001-01-05
No. 2D00-1374
PATTERSON, C.J., and ALTENBERND and NORTHCUTT, JJ„ concur.
779 So. 2d 544 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2001)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The State appeals a trial court's dismissal of a sexually violent predator commitment petition against Darren Goode under Florida's Jimmy Ryce Act. The appeal raises the critical issue of whether the failure to bring the respondent to trial within thirty days of an initial probable cause determination is a proper basis for dismissal, a question certified to the Florida Supreme Court as one of great public importance.


Holding

The appellate court certified the question to the Florida Supreme Court without reaching the merits on this appeal, indicating the issue requires determination by Florida's highest court due to its great public importance and effect on statewide administration of justice.


Headnotes

[1] Failure to bring a respondent to trial within thirty days of the initial probable cause determination under the Jimmy Ryce Act is not a jurisdictional defect.

[2] The thirty-day time limit for commencing a commitment trial under the Jimmy Ryce Act is mandatory, but not jurisdictional.

Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“The issue presented is whether the failure to bring the respondent to trial within thirty days of the initial probable cause determination, pursuant to section 394.916, Florida Statutes (1999), is a proper basis for dismissal of the petition.”

States the central legal question in the case regarding statutory compliance and proper remedies for delay.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The State filed a petition under the Jimmy Ryce Act (sections 394.910-394.930, Florida Statutes) to civilly commit Darren Goode as a sexually violent …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals from an order dismissing an involuntary civil commitment petition against Darren Goode as a sexually violent predator. The State filed the petition pursuant to the Jimmy Ryce Act, sections 394.910-394.930, Florida Statutes (1999). The issue presented is whether the failure to bring the respondent to trial within thirty days of the initial probable cause determination, pursuant to section 394.916, Florida Statutes (1999), is a proper basis for dismissal of the petition.1 On our own motion, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 9.125, we certify that the trial court’s order requires immediate resolution by the Florida Supreme Court because the issue pending is of great public importance and has a great effect on the proper administration of justice throughout the state.

PATTERSON, C.J., and ALTENBERND and NORTHCUTT, JJ„ concur. . In Kinder v. State, 779 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), this court determined that the thirty-day time limit was mandatory but not jurisdictional. As a remedy for the failure to try Kinder within the statutory time frame, this court ordered Kinder's release and certified the following question to the Florida Supreme Court as one of great public importance:

WHETHER THE FAILURE TO COMMENCE A COMMITMENT TRIAL WITHIN THE 30-DAY PERIOD OF SECTION

394.916(1), FLORIDA STATUTES (1999), ABSENT A PRIOR CONTINUANCE FOR GOOD CAUSE, AUTHORIZES THE RELEASE OF THE DETAINED INDIVIDUAL, WHEN THE COMMITMENT CASE HAS NOT BEEN DISMISSED, AND THE TRIAL COURT HAS PREVIOUSLY MADE AN EX PARTE DETERMINATION THAT THERE IS PROBABLE CAUSE TO BELIEVE THAT THE INDIVIDUAL IS A SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATOR IN NEED OF COMMITMENT.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw