LOURDES PERENZUELA, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION AND CREATIVE STAFFING, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 2001-03-21
No. 3D00-2334
Before JORGENSON and FLETCHER, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
779 So. 2d 670 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Lourdes Perenzuela challenges an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission (UAC) dismissing her appeal as untimely. Because there is competent record evidence to support claimant’s argument that her appeal was timely filed, we reverse and remand for a determination on the merits of her claim. See § 443.151(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1999).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Mendelsohn v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 851 So. 2d 208 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)
    …01, and therefore the deadline for filing the administrative appeal. Ms. Mendelsohn testified that she filed an appeal by facsimile transmission on November 2, 2001, three days before the deadline. See Perenzuela v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 779 So. 2d 670 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); see generally Miller v. State, 838 So. 2d 667 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Referee: When did you send the letter of appeal to Fort Lauderdale? Mendelsohn: I faxed it on November 2nd. ‘ Referee: How did you send it to them? Mendelsohn…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw