NICOLEA COLEY, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, SOPHIA COLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA HIGH SCHOOL ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATION, INC., WAYNE STORY, EXECUTIVE SECRETARY OF GREATER MIAMI ATHLETIC CONFERENCE, AND BRIAN H. KLEIMAN, PRINCIPAL OF MIAMI SPRINGS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL, APPELLEES
NICOLEA COLEY, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, SOPHIA COLEY, APPELLANT,
FLORIDA HIGH SCHOOL ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATION, INC., WAYNE STORY, EXECUTIVE SECRETARY OF GREATER MIAMI ATHLETIC CONFERENCE, AND BRIAN H. KLEIMAN, PRINCIPAL OF MIAMI SPRINGS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL, APPELLEES
780 So. 2d 214
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla.1979).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Alain Laffitte Gonzalez, 212 So. 3d 1094 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)…w, Ap-pellee identifies one authority in which we sanctioned such a challenge, concluding [*1097] that the trial court had properly dismissed an information due to the lack of sufficient sworn testimony, pursuant to rule 3.140. In State v. Weinberg, 780 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), the trial court dismissed the charge of “obtaining a controlled substance by fraud” because the police detective who had given the only sworn testimony to support the charge was not a “material witness,” as contemplated by rule…
-
Jones v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr. (Duval County) (M.D. Fla. 2024)…finds sufficient to defeat the defendant's motion to dismiss. Therefore, Defendant was not prejudiced by counsel's alleged failure to contest the information's sufficiency at arraignment. ⁷ State of Florida v. Weinberg, 780 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). 17 ---PAGE 17--- Case 3:21-cv-00440-MMH-MCR Document 29 Filed 09/25/24 Page 18 of 56 PageID 6009 In addition, Defendant alleges prejudice in that counsel failed to preserve this issue for appeal. "[F]ailure to pres…
Authorities Cited
- Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)