PATRICIA ELLSWORTH, APPELLANT,
v.
WILLIAM GALLO, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BROWARD COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, JOHN TOUCHSTONE, JAMES LEE AND FAYE OUTTEN, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's denial of the appellant's second motion for relief from judgment.
The appellant filed a second motion for relief from judgment after her first motion was denied. The trial court denied the second motion because it di…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Civil Procedure 1.540(B) cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks review of a non-final order denying her motion for relief from judgment brought pursuant to rule 1.540(b), Florida' Rules of Civil Procedure. We affirm.
The motion which was denied was appellant’s second 1.540(b) motion for relief. Although we are sympathetic to appellant, who was representing herself prior to entry of the judgment, at a time when both she and her family members had serious health problems, the only grounds the trial court could have considered in the second motion for relief from judgment were grounds which were not litigated by the first motion. Atlas v. City of Pembroke Pines, 441 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malicoat v. LaChappelle, 390 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).
The factual allegations in appellant’s affidavit supporting her first 1.540 motion to vacate the default are ejctremely weak, and the denial of that motion may well have been because of the neglect of counsel in drafting the motion and affidavit or in failing to show up for the hearing on it. Having found no grounds in the second motion which were not alleged in the first motion, other than neglect of her counsel on the first motion, we are compelled to affirm the denial of appellant’s motion for relief from judgment.
AFFIRMED.
KLEIN, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Atlas v. City OF Pembroke Pines, 441 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)
- In the Interest of C. E. M., 390 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)