NAZIR JAMALOODEEN, MARIAM JAMALOODEEN AND HAROUN RASHID JAMALOODEEN, APPELLANTS,

v.

MARY ALEXANDRA JAMALOODEEN AND AUTO PANACHE, L.C., A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, J.M.D.N. FINANCE, L.C., A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, G.H.O.S. REAL ESTATE HOLDING, L.C., A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AND AHMED JAMALOODEEN, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Rogers v. Rogers, 824 So. 2d 902 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
  …. 1st DCA 1994). An exception to this general rule is that income can be imputed based on gifts if the gifts are continuing and ongoing, not sporadic, and where the evidence shows that the gifts will continue in the future. Vorcheimer v. Vorcheimer, 780 So. 2d 1018, 1019 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)(holding that income should not be imputed “absent evidence that the payment would continue in the future”); Ordini v. Ordini, 701 So. 2d 663, 666 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)(holding that “provisions of chapter 61 are broad enough t…
• Oluwek v. Oluwek, 2 So. 3d 1038 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
  …002). An exception applies allowing the court to impute income based on gifts “if the gifts are continuing and ongoing, not sporadic, and where the evidence shows that the gifts will continue in the future.” Id. at 903. In Vorcheimer v. Vorcheimer, 780 So. 2d 1018, 1019 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), the Fourth District held that the trial court erred by imputing $1500 to the husband as income where there was no evidence that the payments would continue. The $1500 payments had been made on a monthly basis for twelve ye…
• POE v. Kurtis POE, 63 So. 3d 842 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)
  …no error in the trial court’s failure to impute income to former husband based on loans from his parents. The testimony reflected these loans were not intended to be continuing and ongoing, but only temporary in nature. See Vorcheimer v. Vorcheimer, 780 So. 2d 1018, 1019 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). We do, however, conclude that the trial court erred in imputing income to former wife. While former wife testified as to her previous year’s income, she also uncontrovertedly testified that she no longer was earning that…

Authorities Cited

• Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
• Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)
• Kozich v. Hartford Ins. Co. OF Midwest, 609 So. 2d 147 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)