R.T.M., FATHER OF M.M., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This case reviews a juvenile curfew ordinance, determining that heightened scrutiny, not strict scrutiny, is the appropriate standard of review for such ordinances.
The court quashes the district court's decision, finding that heightened scrutiny is the correct standard for reviewing the constitutionality of a juvenile curfew ordinance, and remands for further proceedings.
A city ordinance prohibited juveniles from being in public places during certain hours. Juveniles were cited for violations, and the trial court found…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
Having considered. the appellant’s response to the Court’s order, dated February 8, 2001, this appeal is hereby dismissed as an appeal of a nonappealable, nonfinal order. BARFIELD, C.J., WOLF and POLSTON, JJ., concur.