LOUISE KING CROMARTIE AND B. A. CROMARTIE, HER HUSBAND, AND SUE C. KING AND EDWIN BIRD KING, APPELLANTS,
v.
EVERGLADES LUMBER COMPANY, A CORPORATION, ORGANIZED AND DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
LOUISE KING CROMARTIE AND B. A. CROMARTIE, HER HUSBAND, AND SUE C. KING AND EDWIN BIRD KING, APPELLANTS,
EVERGLADES LUMBER COMPANY, A CORPORATION, ORGANIZED AND DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
94 Fla. 958
Florida Supreme Court (1927)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
-This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the orders herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said orders; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said orders of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby affirmed.
Whitpield, P. J., and Terrell and Bupord, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cromartie v. Everglade Lumber Co., 100 Fla. 532 (Fla. 1930)…nvey and that upon the lessees failure to so elect within the time agreed upon the lessors were within their rights when they executed the quitclaim to the Kings. [*536] This is the second appeal in this case. See Cromartie v. Everglades Lumber Co., 94 Fla. 958, 114 So. R. 670. In that case the appeal was taken from orders made on the pleadings in the cause. We think the evidence tends to establish the facts that the corporation entered upon the lands as the assignee of the lease from Gillian and Wenger,…