MARK S. CHODOS, APPELLANT,
v.
KNUT KJENSLIE & RENITA KJENSLIE, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the award of attorney's fees to defendants but reversed and remanded because the trial court improperly included fees for time spent litigating the amount of fees rather than the entitlement to fees.
A trial court may award attorney's fees for time spent litigating entitlement to fees but not for time spent litigating the amount of fees.
[1] Attorney's fees may be awarded for time spent litigating entitlement to fees but not for time spent litigating the amount of fees to be awarded.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceChodos appealed an award of attorney's fees and costs to defendants Knut and Renita Kjenslie following a bench trial in which Chodos unsuccessfully so…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Way Of Necessity cases and more on FLexlaw
THOMPSON, C.J.
Mark S. Chodos, in proper person here and below, appeals an award of attorney’s fees and costs in favor of defendants Knut and Renita Kjenslie. That award followed a bench trial on his attempt to secure a statutory or common law way of necessity, which resulted in a final judgment in the Kjenslies’ favor. Chodos unsuccessfully appealed that result. See Chodos v. Kjenslie, 773 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).
We find all the issues raised by Chodos to be without merit save one. Although we agree with the trial court that an award of attorney’s fees in this case was proper, the trial court abused its discretion in awarding fees for any time the Kjenslies’ attorney spent litigating the amount of fees to which she was entitled. See State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Palma, 629 So. 2d 830 (Fla.1993); In Re Estate of Platt, 586 So. 2d 328 (Fla.1991). On the other hand, time spent litigating the entitlement to fees was recoverable. See Palma, 629 So. 2d at 832-833. The billing records do not clearly break down how many hours were spent preparing to litigate the entitlement to fees versus how many hours were spent litigating the amount of fees. Upon remand, the trial court should revisit the issue of the amount of fees to be awarded in light of this distinction and not award fees for time spent litigating the amount of attorney’s fees to be awarded in this case.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
GRIFFIN, J., and ORFINGER, M., Senior Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Levory W. Hickmon v. State, 965 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Archambault v. State, 781 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). PLEUS, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.…
-
Schilter v. State, 904 So. 2d 634 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…irm the judgment and sentence without prejudice for appellant to pursue his pending (but prematurely filed) pro se motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) wherein he seeks additional credit for time served. See Archambault v. State, 781 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). Affirmed.…
Authorities Cited
- State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Palma, 629 So. 2d 830 (Fla. 1993)
- In re Est. OF Lester Platt, 586 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 1991)
- Vale v. State, 773 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)
- Chodos v. Knut Kjenslie & Renita Kjenslie, 773 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)