BELINDA MCLEOD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Belinda McLeod appealed her sentence imposed upon revocation of community control and probation, arguing the trial court imposed an upward departure from sentencing guidelines without providing reasons. The Second District Court of Appeal agreed and remanded for resentencing, requiring the trial court to provide written reasons if it again imposes a departure sentence.
The trial court imposed upward departures from sentencing guidelines in cases 98-8410 and 98-11931 without providing reasons for the departures. The court therefore reversed and remanded for resentencing, holding that if the trial court again imposes a departure sentence, it must provide written reasons supporting the departure.
[1] A trial court must provide written reasons for imposing a sentence that constitutes an upward departure from the sentencing guidelines.
[2] A sentence imposed upon revocation of probation or community control may constitute a departure from the sentencing guidelines.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“As the sentences imposed in case numbers 98-8410 and 98-11931 were upward departures from the sentencing guidelines and the trial court did not give reasons for the departures, we remand for resentencing in these cases.”
Establishes the core holding that departure sentences require written reasons
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceIn 1998, McLeod received concurrent two-year community control sentences in two cases. Community control in one case was converted to probation. In 19…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Reason for Departure cases and more on FLexlaw
SILBERMAN, Judge.
Belinda McLeod challenges the sentence that she received as a result of her violation of probation. She argues that the trial court imposed a sentence that was an upward departure from the sentencing guidelines, without providing reasons for the departure. We agree and remand for resentencing.
In 1998, following pleas of nolo conten-dere in circuit court case numbers 98-8410 and 98-11931, the trial court sentenced McLeod to concurrent terms of two years’ community control. Thereafter, upon her motion to terminate community control in case number 98-11931, community control was rolled over to probation.
McLeod was charged with new offenses in case number 99-7175. She pleaded guilty to those charges. As a result, her community control in case number 98-8410 and her probation in case number 98-11931 were revoked. In case number 99-7175, McLeod was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment, suspended after five years, to be followed by five years’ probation. In case numbers 98-8410 and 98-11931, she was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment, all prison terms to run concurrently.
McLeod argues, and the State concedes, that the sentences imposed upon the revo cation of her probation and community control were departures under the sentencing guidelines. The State acknowledges that the trial court was not made aware that the sentences were departure sentences.
As the sentences imposed in case numbers 98-8410 and 98-11931 were upward departures from the sentencing guidelines and the trial court did not give reasons for the departures, we remand for resentencing in these cases. See Allison v. State, 728 So. 2d 882 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). On remand, if a sentence departing from the sentencing guidelines is again imposed, the trial court shall give written reasons to support the departure. See Perez v. State, 703 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).
We find no merit in McLeod’s additional argument that the trial court was without jurisdiction to change her community control to probation in case number 98-11931.
Reversed and remanded for resentencing in accordance with this opinion.
THREADGILL, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Dywayne Tony Wilson v. State, 703 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)
- Perez v. State, 703 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)