TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS,
v.
THE BRANDON COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, ET AL., RESPONDENTS
TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS,
THE BRANDON COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, ET AL., RESPONDENTS
782 So. 2d 473
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The Petition for Writ of Common Law Certiorari, which seeks to quash the trial court’s order disqualifying the law firm of Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson from representing the petitioners (defendants in the trial court), is denied. Gaton v. Health Coalition, Inc., 745 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); see also First Miami Sec., Inc. v. Sylvia, 780 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Menuto, 912 So. 2d 603 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)…. Because Menuto’s argument is built upon the equivalence of these “apples and oranges,” the argument fails. Menuto cites cases that loosely employ some of the language of criminal law to describe juvenile proceedings. E.g., C.C.B. [*608] v. State, 782 So. 2d 473, 478 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (noting that section 790.23 made it unlawful for a person to possess any firearm if the person had been “convicted” of a delinquent act); W.J. v. State, 688 So. 2d 954, 957 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (employing the same language).…
-
J.W.J. v. State, 994 So. 2d 1223 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)…art but are constrained to strike or order amendment of certain other special conditions that were not orally pronounced and do not have a statutory basis allowing them to be imposed upon juveniles without an oral pronouncement. See C.C.B. v. State, 782 So. 2d 473, 477-78 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); W.J. v. State, 688 So. 2d 954, 956 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Denial of Motion for Judgment of Dismissal A Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.110(k) motion for judgment of dismissal was made by defense counsel at the end o…
-
I.B. v. State, 806 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)…rder, however, is reversed for modification. Special conditions of probation that are not explicitly authorized by chapter 985, Florida Statutes, or do not involve conduct prohibited by some other statute must be orally pronounced. C.C.B. v. State, 782 So. 2d 473, 476 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). It is undisputed that the order includes four conditions of after care that should be stricken because they were not orally pronounced at the disposition hearing and not authorized by statute: a proscription against certain…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Gaton v. Health Coal., Inc., 745 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
- First Miami Sec., Inc. v. Sylvia, 780 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)