SHEDRIAN LAMONT KINSLER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Augsberger v. State, 655 So. 2d 1202, 1205 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (holding that trial court did not abuse discretion in denying motion to continue for purposes of hiring private counsel on eve of trial where defendant had several months to do so and failed to articulate sufficient reasons for his dissatisfaction with appointed counsel); see also Ball v. State, 758 So. 2d 1239, 1240 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (“[t]his is not a case in which the evidence shows no more than that [the defendant] and others were simultaneously found in proximity to illegal drugs”); Salyers v. State, 705 So. 2d 1024, 1026 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (Fla.R.Crim.P.3.590(a), requiring motion for new trial to be made in a timely fashion, is jurisdictional); Kirkman v. State, 692 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (unless ineffectiveness of counsel is apparent from the face of the record, issue cannot be considered on direct appeal).
THOMPSON, C.J., GRIFFIN, J., and ORFINGER, M., Senior Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Edgewater Beach Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. Walton Cnty., 833 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)…complying with the County’s 1993 comprehensive plan. We review the trial court’s interpretation of section 163.3167(8) de novo. See Execu-Tech Bus. Sys., Inc. v. New Oji Paper Co., 752 So. 2d 582 (Fla.2000); Agency for Health Care Admin. v. Wilson, 782 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Section 163.3167(8) provides that: “Nothing in this act shall limit or modify the rights of any person to complete any development that has been authorized as a development of regional impact pursuant to chapter 380 or who has b…
-
BAY Point Club, Inc. v. BAY Cnty., 890 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)…with the comprehensive plan. I am persuaded by appellant’s view of the law. Because the decision below involves application of statutory provisions to undisputed facts, the standard of review is de novo. See Agency for Health Care Admin, v. Wilson, 782 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Accordingly, this court may decide the legal issue of appellant’s vested rights without deference to FLWAC’s determination. This case involves appellant’s attempt to complete, or move toward completion, a previously authorized…
-
Englich v. Agency for Healthcare Admin., 916 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…ation of the Medicaid lien, and ordered that the lien be paid in full. The plaintiff and AHCA make the same arguments to this court. Because this issue presents a pure question of law, our review is de novo. Agency for Health Care Admin. v. Wilson, 782 So. 2d 977, 978 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). To support his position, the plaintiff relies on the provisions of, and cases interpreting, the Florida Wrongful Death and Medicare Acts. In doing so, he overlooks controlling authority provided by the Medicaid Third-Party…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Augsberger v. State, 655 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
- Ball v. State, 758 So. 2d 1239 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)
- Walker v. State, 692 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)
- Vahteice Kirkman v. State, 692 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)
- Salyers v. State, 705 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)