OTIS FRANK WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a sentence of life imprisonment with a mandatory minimum term of 30 years for a life felony is illegal.
[1] A sentence imposing both a life term and a minimum mandatory term of years for a life felony is illegal when the governing statute provides for a life sentence or a term…
[2] A circuit court errs in denying a motion to correct an illegal sentence when the sentence patently fails to comport with statutory limitations.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceWilliams was convicted of sexual battery and sentenced to life imprisonment with a mandatory minimum of 30 years. He filed a motion to correct his sen…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Life Felony cases and more on FLexlaw
KAHN, J.
Otis Frank Williams appeals the circuit court’s denial of his Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence. Williams raised numerous claims in his motion, and we find that one of those claims has merit. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for appropriate relief.
In 1980, a jury convicted Williams of sexual battery while armed, a life felony, in violation of section 794.011(3), Florida Statutes (1979). The court sentenced him to “State Prison for the remainder of your natural life (not less than 30 years).” In his motion, Williams argued that the court could not sentence him to both life and not less than 30 years, and he cited, in support of his claim, Wright v. State, 425 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). The circuit court rejected this argument, finding that Williams was not sentenced to two punishments on this charge, but rather he received a sentence of life in prison with the requirement that he serve no less than 30 years.
Section 775.082(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1979), provided punishment for a life felony by “a term of imprisonment for life or for a term of years not less than 30.” In Wright v. State, the court affirmed appellant’s convictions for sexual battery, aggravated battery, and trespass, but remanded for correction of his sentence because “the trial court improperly required appellant to serve a minimum mandatory term of thirty years of his life sentence for the sexual battery.” Wright, 425 So. 2d at 65. Likewise, in this ease, the sentencing court improperly imposed a 30-year minimum mandatory term. Athough the life felony statute gave the trial judge an option to impose either a life sentence or a term of years of not less than 30, it did not autho-nze a minimum mandatory term. Therefore, Williams’ sentence is illegal, and the circuit court erred in denying this claim. See State v. Mancino, 714 So. 2d 429, 433 (Fla.1998) (“A sentence that patently fails to comport with statutory or constitutional limitations is by definition ‘illegal.’ ”).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
BOOTH and VAN NORTWICK, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jones v. State, 872 So. 2d 938 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)…Cheney v. State, 640 So. 2d 103, 105 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Dyer v. State, 629 So. 2d 285, 286 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Stephens v. State, 627 So. 2d 543, 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). . Kendrick v. State, 817 So. 2d 951 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Williams v. State, 782 So. 2d 980 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 805 So. 2d 811 (Fla.2001); Smith v. State, 654 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (holding that there must be statutory authority for imposition of mandatory minimum sentence); see also Carter v. State, 786 So. 2d 1173, 118…
-
Fillyaw v. State, 853 So. 2d 590 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…; Cheney v. State, 640 So. 2d 103, 105 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Dyer v. State, 629 So. 2d 285, 286 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Stephens v. State, 627 So. 2d 543, 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). .Kendrick v. State, 817 So. 2d 951 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Williams v. State, 782 So. 2d 980 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 805 So. 2d 811 (Fla.2001); Smith v. State, 654 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (holding that there must be statutory authority for imposition of minimum mandatory sentence); see also Carter v. State, 786 So. 2d 1173, 118…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Mancino, 714 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 1998)
- Wright v. State, 425 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982)