THOMAS R. WILLIAMSON, III, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
KATHLEEN G. WILLIAMSON, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the final judgment of the trial court in part, but remanded for correction of an account valuation and to reflect a property stipulation.
The parties appealed a final judgment concerning alimony, equitable distribution, and personal property. The trial court made certain valuations and d…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Stipulation cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
On the direct appeal, except as noted below, we affirm the final judgment of the trial court. The court’s decision on alimony was within the bounds of its discretion. See Avery v. Avery, 548 So. 2d 865, 866 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Bradley v. Bradley, 347 So. 2d 789, 790 (Fla. Bd DCA 1977). Many of the factors the trial court considered in awarding alimony also support an unequal distribution of marital assets.
We agree that the trial court erroneously valued the First Union account at $11,210. On remand, the account should be valued pursuant to the pretrial stipulation, and the trial court may adjust the equitable distribution, if appropriate.
On the cross-appeal, the final judgment should reflect the parties’ stipulation that the former wife is entitled to the following items of personal property: stereo system, generator, iron, shredder, Mr. Williamson’s wedding band, two four-drawer cabinets with original contents, GE portable VCR, and JVC camera.
Except as noted in the two preceding paragraphs, the final judgment is affirmed.
FARMER, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Bradley v. Bradley, 347 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
- Avery v. Avery, 548 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)