THE STATE OF FLORIDA EX REL. J. C. STEWART, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
FRANK KAREL, SHERIFF OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
THE STATE OF FLORIDA EX REL. J. C. STEWART, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
FRANK KAREL, SHERIFF OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
94 Fla. 1039
Florida Supreme Court (1927)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Stoutamire, 98 Fla. 486 (Fla. 1929)…. Laws 1927, covering the same subject. See Sec. 10 Chapter 8411, Acts of 1921. ’ ' Chapter 8411, Acts 1921, is quite different from Chapter 11336, Acts of 1925, and Chapter 12223, Acts of 1927, considered in State ex rel Stewart v. Karel, Sheriff, 94 Fla. 1039, 114 So. R. 669. Chapter 5597, Acts 1907, considered in Afro-American etc. v. State, 61 Fla. 85, 54 So. R. 383, is unlike Chapter 8411, Acts 1921. Legal conflict between the provisions of Chapter 6421, Acts 1913, contained in Section 896, Rev. Gen.…