THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
VALERIE LEVON WOODS, APPELLEE
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
VALERIE LEVON WOODS, APPELLEE
783 So. 2d 361
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Because the State failed to properly preserve its objection to the trial court’s imposition of the downward departure sentence, we affirm. See State v. Henriquez, 717 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); State v. Rodriguez, 673 So. 2d 187 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Taylor v. Terrie E. Bonsall, 875 So. 2d 705 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)…rthday. The court ruled that the order related back to the date the mother filed the petition for modification of Devon’s child support. Thus, the court found that paragraph seven did not preclude the extension of child support, citing Ruiz v. Ruiz, 783 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) and distinguishing Brown v. Brown, 714 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). The court ordered the father “to continue to contribute support” for Devon after her eighteenth birthday pursuant to section 743.07, Florida Statutes. Because…1 / 2
-
Loza v. Marin, 198 So. 3d 1017 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)…476-77. The Fifth District affirmed, reasoning that the husband’s obligation had expired and that an independent action must be brought by the adult dependent child pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.210(b). Id. at 477. In Ruiz v. Ruiz, 783 So. 2d 361, 362 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), the husband and wife entered into a dissolution agreement which recognized that one of their daughters- “is a handicapped child and is totally non-commuñicative.” Husband was required to -pay $1248 for the affected daughter…
-
State v. Rivera, 844 So. 2d 779 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See State v. Henriquez, 717 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); State v. Woods, 783 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Henriquez, 717 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
- State v. Rodriguez, 673 So. 2d 187 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)