KENNETH CALDWELL, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Klette v. Klette, 785 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
  …provided neither a transcript nor a statement as provided by Rule 9.200(b)(4), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Because of this, we cannot conduct “an examination of the entire case” as we are directed by section 59.041. Cf. Rollins v. Rollins, 783 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (Where no transcript or Rule 9.200(b)(4) statement is provided, “appellate review is precluded and we are unable to ascertain whether the trial court erred.”). [*564] We find that a harmless error analysis is mandated in this cas…
• Rose v. Clements, 973 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)
  …Thus, this court is unable to review the factual or legal basis for the trial court’s decision. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979); Klette v. Klette, 785 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Rollins v. Rollins, 783 So. 2d 1114, 1115 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); M.J. v. A.B., 694 So. 2d 888 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). “Litigants who proceed ... without a court reporter take a calculated risk. If the facts are determined adversely they may well be unable to demonstrate error on appeal due…

Authorities Cited

• Peterson v. State, 775 So. 2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
• Hall v. State, 773 So. 2d 99 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)