A.V., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
A.V., APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
784 So. 2d 1168
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
SALCINES, Judge.
A.V. appeals two restitution orders. The first restitution order was signed on May 25, 2000, and the second, which amended the original restitution order, was signed and rendered during the pendency of this appeal. We affirm the original order without discussion. However, as conceded by the State, the amended restitution order rendered during the pendency of this appeal, without this court’s relinquishment of jurisdiction, was void and must be stricken.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part.
PATTERSON, C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hannah v. State, 876 So. 2d 655 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)…indicates an offense date of December 28, 1992, shows that the case was “direct information filed (juvenile)” and, under “comments,” notes “c/o juv dent center.” The capias was executed on January 15,1993. The trial court, citing to Bain v. State, 784 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), dismissed this claim without prejudice to Hannah filing a properly supported motion. The trial court stated that Hannah failed to provide and the record did not contain any documentation to support the claim. This court has previ…
-
Mazza v. State, 804 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)…h those portions of the record that correspond with all dates for which [Maz-za] claims he should receive jail credit, including any time spent in [custody in Georgia] under any Hillsborough County detainers that may have been filed.” Bain v. State, 784 So. 2d 1168, 1170 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). [*614] Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. WHATLEY, A.C.J., and SALCINES, J., Concur.…
-
Taylor v. State, 804 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)…Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because Taylor’s motion is facially insufficient, we affirm the trial court’s order without prejudice to Taylor’s right to raise the issue in a rule 3.800(a) motion which meets the pleading requirement of Bain v. State, 784 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), or in a sworn rule 3.850 motion. See Bryant v. State, 787 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Affirmed. FULMER, SILBERMAN, and COVINGTON, JJ., Concur.…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence