JUDITH G. DAVERSA, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF KATHERINE E. GAUDREAULT, APPELLANT,
v.
BEVERLY ENTERPRISES FLORIDA, INC. D/B/A BEVERLY GULF COAST FLORIDA, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORP. AUTHORIZED TO OPERATE JUPITER CARE CENTER, APPELLEE
JUDITH G. DAVERSA, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF KATHERINE E. GAUDREAULT, APPELLANT,
BEVERLY ENTERPRISES FLORIDA, INC. D/B/A BEVERLY GULF COAST FLORIDA, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORP. AUTHORIZED TO OPERATE JUPITER CARE CENTER, APPELLEE
785 So. 2d 530
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Because appellee, Beverly Enterprises Florida, Inc., d/b/a Beverly Gulf Coast Florida, Inc., a California corporation authorized to operate Jupiter Care Center, concedes error in the orders on appeal, on the authority of May v. Illinois Insurance Co., 771 So. 2d 1143 (Fla.2000), and Comerica Bank & Trust, F.S.B. v. SDI Operating Partners, L.P., 673 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), we reverse the orders compelling payment of a claim and extending the time for filing an independent action.
DELL, POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Y.G. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 830 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)…between the mother and her paramour caused the children to suffer abuse. The written findings must be amended to conform with the oral pronouncement. D.F., Jr. v. State, 650 So. 2d 1097 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); NM. v. Department of Children and Families, 785 So. 2d 530 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). The fact that a remand is necessary to have the written order amended does not mean that the underlying adjudication of dependency, based on prospective neglect, must be reversed. To the contrary, competent substantial evidence…
-
Wilkinson v. Claudette A. Wilkinson, 203 So. 3d 186 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)…1993); Gallardo v. Gallardo, 593 So. 2d 522, 524 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)); Y.G. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 830 So. 2d 212, 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (citing D.F., Jr. v. State, 650 So. 2d 1097 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); N.M. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 785 So. 2d 530 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)). Further, the oral ruling and the written judgment both include mathematical error, which must be corrected. See Doyle v. Doyle, 789 So. 2d 499, 501 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (“[Notwithstanding the trial court’s wide discretion in dis…
Authorities Cited
- David R. MAY Ad Litem of the Estate of Oscar T. Bradley v. Ill. Nat'l Ins. Co., 771 So. 2d 1143 (Fla. 2000)
- Comerica Bank & Tr. v. SDI Operating P'rs, L.P., 673 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)