KEVIN HARTAGE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
KEVIN HARTAGE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
785 So. 2d 636
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed, without prejudice to refile a legally sufficient motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. See Baker v. State, 714 So. 2d 1167, 1167 n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (explaining that “[t]he allegations required by [State v.] Mancino[, 714 So. 2d 429 (Fla.1988)] at a minimum would have to address how and where the record demonstrates entitlement to relief.”).
POLEN, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
John H. Faro, P.A. v. Porchester Holdings, Inc., 792 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…ght unsuccessfully to garnish Massachusetts Mutual for that part of the cash surrender value of the policies that remained in [*1263] Massachusetts Mutual’s possession. This court in Technical Chemicals & Products, Inc. v. Porchester Holdings, Inc., 785 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), held that the cash surrender value of the life insurance policies in the possession of Massachusetts Mutual was exempt from garnishment pursuant to section 222.14, Florida Statutes (1997), but declined to decide whether TCPI cou…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Mancino, 714 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 1998)
- Williamson v. Penni Lane Williamson, 714 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
- Baker v. State, 714 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)