INTERCARGO INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
DONALD KAPLAN AND CITIBANK, F.S.B., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the trial court's denial of a motion to dismiss and remedy, upholding the adjudication of dependency for two children and holding that a party cannot collaterally challenge their appointed counsel's performance in a dependency proceeding, other than through a malpractice action.
The court held that S.B. has no right to collaterally challenge her appointed counsel's performance in a dependency proceeding, except by filing a malpractice action.
S.B. failed to appear at an arraignment hearing for her two daughters, which resulted in an adjudication of dependency based on statutory consent. She…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Garrote v. Ocean Bank, 713 So. 2d 1095, 1097 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(dragnet clause covers future debts when obligations are of the “same kind and class”); Grant S. Nelson and Dale A. Whitman, Real Estate Finance Law § 12.8, at 227-28 (3d ed.1993).