LISA C. GREGOR, APPELLANT,
v.
CHRISTOPHER J. GREGOR, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2001-04-30
No. 1D00-2536
BARFIELD, C.J., and POLSTON, J., concur; WOLF, J., concurs and dissents with opinion.
786 So. 2d 28 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2001) Positive Treatment
Cited by 50 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, C.J., and POLSTON, J., concur; WOLF, J., concurs and dissents with opinion.

Other
WOLF, J.,

WOLF, J.,

concurring and dissenting.

I concur in the affirmance in all respects but one. I believe the trial court erred in failing to award the wife any of the costs and fees of the vocational rehabilitation specialist who testified at trial.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (25 total)

  • Brannon v. State, 850 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 2003)
    …ntencing guidelines in the trial court, despite the existence of adverse precedent in Trapp v. State, 736 So. 2d 736 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), in order to later obtain appellate relief based on Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla.2000). Harvey v. State, 786 So. 2d 28, 32-33 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). We combined these two questions into one: Whether an appellant in the First District Court of Appeal who could have availed himself of the procedural mecha [*458] nism of the most recent amendments to Florida Rule of Cri…
  • Salim Kamau Latiif v. State, 787 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 2001)
    …ent with this opinion. It is so ordered. [*838] WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ„ concur. . We address the Heggs issue here because Latiif's case falls within the window period described in Maddox. Cf. Harvey v. State, 786 So. 2d 28 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (certifying for this Court's review the question, "Whether an appellant in the First District Court of Appeal, who could have availed himself of the procedural mechanism of the most recent amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal P…
  • Cardenas v. State, 816 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)
    …time of his trial, by virtue of the pendency in the supreme court of the question certified by this court in State v. Miles, 732 So. 2d 350 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), that the argument he now makes on appeal might have some validity. See Harvey v. State, 786 So. 2d 28, 30 (Fla. 1st DCA)(holding that pendency of issue in supreme court places appellant on notice of potential validity of issue, such that he should preserve issue for appellate review in order to obtain any benefit from favorable ruling by supreme cou…

Previewing 3 of 25 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw