L.S. AND S.S., APPELLANTS,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES APPELLEE
L.S. AND S.S., APPELLANTS,
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES APPELLEE
786 So. 2d 588
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
In view of the fact that an examination of the record of the proceedings below reflect no error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in all respects.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Eckerd Corp. v. Zaremba Land DEV., L.L.C., 790 So. 2d 591 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)…tion. The lower court found the deed restriction to be unambiguous and found that by its express terms it did not prohibit construction of the parking lot and signage. Subsequently, this court decided the case of Eckerd Corp. v. Corners Group, Inc., 786 So. 2d 588 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). Based on that precedent, we reverse. In Comers Group, the panel majority concluded that a deed restriction against use of the restricted parcel “as a pharmacy or drug store” was intended to prohibit any use of the restricted par…
-
Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Dolgencorp, LLC, 746 F.3d 1008 (11th Cir. 2014)…parties seek to enforce restrictive covenants involving the operation of grocery stores and similar establishments, as best as we can tell, the Florida courts have made no mention of any demand requirement. See Eckerd Corp. v. Corners Grp., Inc., 786 So. 2d 588, 590 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); AC Assocs. v. First Nat’l Bank of Fla., 453 So. 2d 1121, 1124 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Norwood Shopping Ctr., 135 So. 2d at 449; see also Massari v. Salciccia, 102 Fla. 847, 852, 136 So. 522 (1931). In Dolgencorp, the Florida…