RAYNARD WILDER, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Zachem v. Paradigm Props. Mgmt. Team, Inc., 867 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)
  …court.* Zachem v. Paradigm Props. Mgmt. Team, Inc., 861 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (table). A nominal offer is appropriate where the of-feror has-a reasonable basis to believe that exposure to liability is minimal. See, e.g., Dean v. Vazquez, 786 So. 2d 637, 640 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (“[A]s confirmed by the jury verdict the Defendants had a reasonable basis to conclude their exposure was nominal.”); Deltona House Rentals, Inc. v. Cloer, 734 So. 2d 586,-588 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) (“In. light of the manifest…
• Donovan Marine, Inc. v. Delmonico, 40 So. 3d 69 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)
  …e of the employee’s employment. Rather, the employer maintained the statement was not defamatory because it was true, and further that it failed to cause any resulting damage. The jury verdict confirmed that employer’s position. See Dean v. Vazquez, 786 So. 2d 637, 640 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). In short, the trial court correctly found that the proposal was “a good faith offer based upon the discovery [and] the posture of the case at the time the offer was extended.... ” We find no merit in the plaintiffs argumen…
• Haynes v. Blackshear (Fla. 2d DCA 2020)
  …ar, M.D., provided reasonable care 4We recognize that the plain language of section 766.111 does not appear to require that any injury result from the unnecessary test in order to entitle a plaintiff to attorney's fees. However, in Dean v. Vazquez, 786 So. 2d 637, 639 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), the Fourth District held that "section 766.111 does not establish a cause of action independent of the requirements of section 766.102," which requires proof of "death, injury or monetary loss arising out of any medical, de…

  ← 1 / 2 →