WILFRED VALMYRE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WILFRED VALMYRE, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
786 So. 2d 665
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Trease v. State, 768 So. 2d 1050 (Fla.2000); Hamilton v. State, 703 So. 2d 1038 (Fla.1997); Edwards v. State, 548 So. 2d 656 (Fla.1989).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The City OF Fort Lauderdale v. Israel, 178 So. 3d 444 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)…ns arising out of that written contract. Id, at 698; nee - also Cnty. of Brevard, v. Miorelli Eng’g, Inc., 703 So. 2d 1049, 1051 (Fla.1998) (approving Champagne-Webber’s interpretation- of Pan-Ant, on this issue); Town of Palm Beach v. Ryan Inc. E., 786 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (upholding Champagm-W.ebber), ■ The City argues that in this case the Sheriffs claim is barred by sovereign immunity because it was not based on an express written contract at all. Rather, it was based solely on a theory of impl…
-
Caulkins Indiantown Citrus Co. v. Nevins Fruit Co., Inc., 831 So. 2d 727 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)…ble to the nonmoving party, and all conflicts in the evidence must be resolved in favor of the nonmoving party. See First Nat’l Bank & Trust Co. of Treasurer Coast v. Pack, 789 So. 2d 411, 413 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Town of Palm Beach v. Ryan Inc. E., 786 So. 2d 665, 668 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). On the claim for overyield, the trial court did not err in granting a directed verdict. As discussed above, the contract unambiguously provides that Caulkins was allowed to retain overyield. Thus, there was no breach and n…
Authorities Cited
- Trease v. State, 768 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 2000)
- Hamilton v. State, 703 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 1997)
- Derinda Edwards v. State, 548 So. 2d 656 (Fla. 1989)