MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, APPELLANT,
v.
ADA BARILARI, APPELLEE
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, APPELLANT,
ADA BARILARI, APPELLEE
786 So. 2d 672
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Vann v. American Motorists Ins. Co., 627 So. 2d 601, 602 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (stating that “none of the comments made by defense counsel were so prejudicial or inflammatory as to require mistrial, or a new trial, especially where the witness never answered the question and no evidence on the issue was ever presented to the jury”); see also Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Gutierrez, 731 So. 2d 151, 152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (“find[ing] that the trial court properly sustained the objections when necessary and properly gave curative instructions when necessary that obviated the harm,” and thus did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for a new trial).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Vann v. Am. Motorists Ins. Co. & Elliot, 627 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Gutierrez, 731 So. 2d 151 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)