ANTONIO MIKELL, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2001-06-13

No. 3D00-675

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON, J., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.

786 So. 2d 673 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001) Positive Treatment

Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

No error has been demonstrated either in the trial court’s ruling denying post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing or in refusing the defendant’s request for the appointment of counsel. See Williams v. State, 472 So. 2d 738 (Fla.1985); Cole v. State, 758 So. 2d 1289 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), review denied, 780 So. 2d 912 (Fla.2001).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

Deirdre Murphy v. Murphy, 912 So. 2d 353 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)

…adverse order granting William Murphy’s (“husband”), emergency motion for release of funds. Because the trial court entered its order without conducting a hearing on the husband’s exceptions, we reverse. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.490(h); Lehrman v. Vondra, 786 So. 2d 673 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Scott v. Scott, 667 So. 2d 975 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Berkheimer v. Berkheimer, 466 So. 2d 1219 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); see also Bragassa v. Bragassa, 505 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)(master’s findings cannot be overturned by the tri…

Authorities Cited

Williams v. State, 472 So. 2d 738 (Fla. 1985)
Cole v. State, 758 So. 2d 1289 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw