HAROLD RIVERS AND LONNIE BOATRIGHT, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
HAROLD RIVERS AND LONNIE BOATRIGHT, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
95 Fla. 97
Florida Supreme Court (1928)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause -having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been séen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Criminal Court of Record be,'and the same is hereby, affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mathis v. State, 134 Fla. 352 (Fla. 1938)…that a verdict of a jury will not be set aside as against the evidence, unless it may be well assumed that the jury was improperly influenced by considerations outside the evidence. See Kirkland v. State, 93 Fla. 172, 111 So. 351; Whitton v. State, 95 Fla. 97, 111 So. 514. See also Armstrong v. State, 30 Fla. 170, 11 So. 618, 17 L. R. A. 484; Howell v. State, 102 Fla. 612, 136 So. 456, 139 So. 187. The sentence of the Court, or the judgment, entered in the lower court against the plaintiff in error is'…