ANTHONY A. SUTTON, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
ANTHONY A. SUTTON, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
786 So. 2d 1171
Florida Supreme Court (2001)
Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, J.
We have for review Sutton v. State, 747 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We vacate the decision of the district court and remand for reconsideration upon application of our decisions in Grant v. State, 770 So. 2d 655 (Fla.2000); State v. Cotton, 769 So. 2d 345 (Fla.2000); McKnight v. State, 769 So. 2d 1039 (Fla.2000); and Ellis v. State, 762 So. 2d 912 (Fla.2000).
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, and PARIENTE, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Grant v. State, 770 So. 2d 655 (Fla. 2000)
- State v. Cotton, 769 So. 2d 345 (Fla. 2000)
- Ellis v. State, 762 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 2000)
- McKNIGHT v. State, 769 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. 2000)
- Sutton v. State, 747 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)
- MAY v. State, 747 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)