CHRISTOPHER COLE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2001-05-30
No. 3D99-2237
Before LEVY, FLETCHER and SHEVIN, JJ.
786 So. 2d 1203 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In view of the response of the Florida Parole Commission stating that Defendant is parole eligible, and defendant’s supplemental reply, we find that the court correctly determined that the terms of defendant’s plea agreement were satisfied. Defendant’s remaining points lack merit.

Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Cole v. State, 225 So. 3d 938 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)
    …enty-five year mandatory minimum sentences (imposed concurrently as part of the life sentences on counts nine and ten) are illegal, we note that Cole has completed this portion of his sentence, and is already eligible for parole.1 See Cole v. State, 786 So. 2d 1203 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001),.We therefore dismiss this portion of the appeal as moot. See, e.g., State v. Ortiz, 79 So. 3d 177 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Mathews v. State, 91 So. 3d [*939] 142 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); Maybin v. State, 884 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).…
  • Cole v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2022)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw