LEON M. WOLFE AND WALLACE A. CARTER, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
LEON M. WOLFE AND WALLACE A. CARTER, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
95 Fla. 115
Florida Supreme Court (1928)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 116 So. 72
Cited by 21 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
Plaintiffs in error were indicted, tried and convicted in Lake County, Florida, as principals in the second degree to the crime of robbery.
On careful analysis of the record we do not think the verdict in this case accords with the manifest weight of the evidence or with the justice of the cause, so the judgment will be and is hereby reversed and a new trial awarded. Ming v. State, 89 Fla. 280, 103 South. Rep. 618.
Reversed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Elias, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Thursby v. Stewart, 103 Fla. 990 (Fla. 1931)…ate. Section 2, article 16, requires every officer to take the prescribed oath. Section 7, article 16, provides that the Legislature shall not create any office, the term of which shall be longer than four years.” Dade County vs. State, 95 Fla. 465, 116 So. 72, 76. We are impelled to the conclusion that the lower court committed no error in granting the order temporarily restraining the Board of Trustees of Volusia County Fair from issuing any note under color of Senate Bill No. 911, for the sum of $83,0…
-
Crandon v. Hazlett, 157 Fla. 574 (Fla. 1946)…e as the Welfare Committee, and therefore such a committee and its chairman have no legal or official status and did not have when this act was [*583] adopted. See Section 27 of Article III of the Constitution, and Dade County v. State, 95 Fla. 465, 116 So. 72. The present act does not create such a committee nor define its powers or duties, nor the method of the selection of its chairman. The act merely assumed that as a matter of fact the County Commissioners of Dade County already had in existence such…
-
Love v. Hannah, 72 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 1954)…laim upon which relief could be granted. Obviously, it was not error to overrule this motion, because the complaint was adequate to recover damages under Section 45.11, Florida Statutes 1951, F.S. A. See Brown v. Pennsylvania Sugar Co., 95 Fla. 116, 116 So. 72; Hawkins v. Shore Acres Properties, 93 Fla. 671, 112 So. 61. The objection by Mr. Cushman, defendants’ attorney, to the question of whether it was necessary to support the “baby girl,” Alberta 'heretofore quoted) was on the ground “it is not materi…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Ming v. State, 89 Fla. 280 (Fla. 1925)