FRANCIS M. BROWN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,

v.

PENNSYLVANIA SUGAR COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND E. R. GRAHAM, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

Citator

Cited By

• Love v. Hannah, 72 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 1954)
  …to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Obviously, it was not error to overrule this motion, because the complaint was adequate to recover damages under Section 45.11, Florida Statutes 1951, F.S. A. See Brown v. Pennsylvania Sugar Co., 95 Fla. 116, 116 So. 72; Hawkins v. Shore Acres Properties, 93 Fla. 671, 112 So. 61. The objection by Mr. Cushman, defendants’ attorney, to the question of whether it was necessary to support the “baby girl,” Alberta 'heretofore quoted) was on the ground “it i…
• The Biscayne Co. v. Martin, 95 Fla. 259 (Fla. 1928)
  …n every respect, to the case of Charles Deering et al. v. John W. Martin et al., as Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of Florida, and A. O. Henderson, decided at this term, wherein the decree of the court below was reversed. See 95 Fla. 116, South. Rep. 54. Under the opinion above mentioned, the decree of the court below in this ease is reversed.…
• Biscayne Tr. Co. v. Pa. Sugar Co., 103 Fla. 155 (Fla. 1931)
  …sources so that the aforesaid lands of the plaintiff were overflowed” and the plaintiff’s growing crops injured, etc. Such allegation with others appropriately stated, do not wholly fail to state a cause of action. Brown v. Pennsylvania Sugar Co., 95 Fla. 116, 116 So. 72. [*157] Defendants each pleaded not guilty together with special pleas. At the conclusion of the presentation of the plaintiff’s case at the trial, the defendants moved the court to direct a verdict for them on various grounds which in…

Authorities Cited

• McDonald v. Exch. Supply Co., 88 Fla. 80 (Fla. 1924)
• Cummings Machine Works v. Clark, 89 Fla. 383 (Fla. 1925)
• Yon v. Pinellas Cnty. Power Co., 93 Fla. 503 (Fla. 1927)
• Hawkins v. Shore Acres Props., 93 Fla. 670 (Fla. 1927)