MARSHALL KNIGHT, APPELLANT,
v.
BETH S. WATERS, APPELLEE
MARSHALL KNIGHT, APPELLANT,
BETH S. WATERS, APPELLEE
786 So. 2d 1289
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the appealed order because the appellant’s section 784.046(7)(e), Florida Statutes, motion to modify or dissolve the injunction in this case did not assert changed circumstances which would warrant relief. This does not preclude the appellant from filing a motion asserting such changed circumstances, and seeking a hearing thereon.
ALLEN, WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Haifa Y. Alkhoury v. Basem J. Alkhoury, 54 So. 3d 641 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)…es make it equitable to do so.... ” Hale v. Miracle Enters. Corp., 517 So. 2d 102, 103 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). The requirement to show changed circumstances applies equally to modification or dissolution of a protective injunction. See Knight v. Waters, 786 So. 2d 1289 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Simonik v. Patterson, 752 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Also, and by analogy, a party seeking an extension of a domestic violence injunction “must present evidence from which a trial court can determine that a continuing fear e…
-
Colarusso v. Lupetin, 28 So. 3d 238 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)…has not clearly set forth the applicable legal standard for determining whether a domestic violence injunction should be vacated or modified. Some cases seem to require the movant to allege and prove a change in circumstances. See Knight v. Waters, 786 So. 2d 1289 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (affirming order denying a motion to modify or dissolve a protective injunction under section 784.046 because the motion did not assert a change in circumstances); Simonik v. Patterson, 752 So. 2d 692, 693 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (“In…
-
Reyes v. Reyes, 104 So. 3d 1206 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)…has not clearly set forth the applicable legal standard for determining whether a domestic violence injunction should be vacated or modified. Some cases seem to require the movant to allege and prove a change in circumstances. See Knight v. Waters, 786 So. 2d 1289 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (affirming order denying a motion to modify or dissolve a protective injunction under section 784.046 because the motion did not assert a change in circumstances); Simonik v. Patterson, 752 So. 2d 692, 693 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (“In…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence