ABRAHAM MISROCK, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
LESTER LEVI, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
ABRAHAM MISROCK, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
LESTER LEVI, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
95 Fla. 182
Florida Supreme Court (1928)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jones v. Cook, 146 Fla. 253 (Fla. 1941)…am v. Bowles, 72 Fla. 259, 72 So. 931; State v. Dillon, 75 Fla. 785, 79 So. 29; In Re Robinson, 73 Fla. 1068, 75 So. 604, L. R. A. 1918B, 1148; State v. Logan, 87 Fla. 348, 100 So. 173; Carroll v. Merritt, 91 Fla. 893, 109 So. 630; Roberts v. State, 95 Fla. 182, 116 So. 228; Crooke v. Van Pelt, 76 Fla. 20, 79 So. 166; Futch v. State, 101 Fla. 328, 134 So. 791; Lehman v. Sawyer (Fla.), 143 So. 310. It would delay and disturb the orderly course of the administration of the criminal law if defendants were pe…
-
Isiah Hamilton v. State, 237 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970)…ourse was through petition to the trial court for a writ of coram nobis. It is well settled that habeas corpus is not a corrective remedy, and thus is not always available where a writ of coram nobis would be obtainable. See Roberts v. State, 1928, 95 Fla. 182, 116 So. 228. It also appears that petition for writ of coram nobis on the basis of newly discovered evidence would not come within the scope of CrPR 1.850, which is concerned with collateral attacks in the nature of imposing sentence in violation o…