BILLY BOYD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Criminal Procedure 3.850 cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Billy Boyd appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court properly concluded that the motion was untimely because it was filed more than two years after this court issued its mandate. See Beaty v. State, 701 So. 2d 856 (Fla.1997). Thus, we affirm the trial court.
On the other hand, this court accepted Mr. Boyd’s motion for rehearing and entered an order denying his motion well after we issued mandate. He filed his postconviction motion within two years of that order. Although we should not have accepted and ruled upon his motion, having done so it is obvious that we misled him as to the time within which to file his motion. Accordingly, Mr. Boyd shall be authorized to file a motion for postconviction relief, which shall not be deemed untimely so long as it is filed within thirty days of the issuance of our mandate in this case.
Affirmed.
ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., and DANAHY, (Senior) Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (31 total)
-
Gill v. Gill, 50 So. 3d 772 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)…asonable cause to fear becoming the victim of imminent domestic violence, “the trial court must consider the current allegations, the parties’ behavior within the relationship, and the history of the relationship as a whole.” Giallanza v. Giallanza, 787 So. 2d 162, 164 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (citing Gustafson v. Mauck, 743 So. 2d 614, 616 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)); see also § 741.30(6)(b). Here, the Former Wife’s evidence was legally insufficient to meet the statutory requirements for issuance of an injunction agains…
-
Young v. Shelitha Kay Smith, 901 So. 2d 372 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)…ish either that she had been the victim of an act of domestic violence or that she had reasonable cause to believe she was in imminent danger of becoming the victim of an act of domestic violence. See § 741.30(1)(a); see also Giallanza v. Giallanza, 787 So. 2d 162, 164 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). At the evidentiary hearing, Ms. Smith did not testify that she had ever been a victim of past domestic violence at the hand of Mr. Young. She attempted to prove that she had reasonable cause to believe that she was in immine…
-
Jones v. Jones, 32 So. 3d 772 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)…a. Stat. (2007)). In determining whether the victim’s fear is reasonable, “the trial court must consider the current allegations, the parties’ behavior within the relationship, and the history of the relationship as a whole.” Giallanza v. Giallanza, 787 So. 2d 162, 164 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (citing Gustafson v. Maude, 743 So. 2d 614, 616 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)); see also § 741.30(6)(b), Fla. Stat. (2008). Ms. Jones did not present any evidence that she had been the victim of domestic violence. She relied exclusive…
Previewing 3 of 31 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Beaty v. State, 701 So. 2d 856 (Fla. 1997)