ROMEL DEON EDWARD, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2001-05-09
No. 3D00-1314
Before GERSTEN, GODERICH and SHEVIN, JJ.
787 So. 2d 170 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant’s conviction and sentence without prejudice to defendant filing a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion alleging ineffective as sistance of counsel. We express no opinion as to the merits of such allegation.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Gomez v. State, 832 So. 2d 793 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
    …ent record does not conclusively refute the defendant’s claim, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D), we reverse this part of the order denying the Rule 3.850 motion and remand for an evi-dentiary hearing or other appropriate relief. See Brown v. State, 787 So. 2d 170 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Garcia v. State, 736 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). See generally Cottle v. State, 733 So. 2d 963 (Fla.1999); State v. Moses, 682 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). We affirm the denial of postconviction relief on the defendant’s re…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw