SAMUEL DEAN HART, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
SAMUEL DEAN HART, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
787 So. 2d 963
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2001)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the denial of Mr. Hart’s motion to correct an illegal sentence. We note that Mr. Hart is currently serving a life sentence for kidnaping that this court expressly decided was a preguidelines sentence. See Hart v. State, 464 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). Thus, the sentence would appear to be a parole-eligible sentence.
ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Mahmoud GAD, 27 So. 3d 768 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)…rent prejudice associated with any relevant evidence. “ ‘Relevant evidence is inherently prejudicial; however it is only unfair prejudice, substantially outweighing probative value, which permits exclusion of relevant matters.’ ” State v. Blackwell, 787 So. 2d 963, 965 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (quoting State v. Andres, 552 So. 2d 1151, 1153 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)). “ ‘Section 90.403 ... is directed at evidence which inflames the jury or appeals improperly to the jur[ors’] emotions.’ ” Steverson v. State, 695 So. 2d 68…
-
Hawthorne v. State, 248 So. 3d 1261 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)
-
Felice John Veach v. State, 254 So. 3d 624 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Hardinghaus v. Enslen, 464 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)