VINCENT PARRISH, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Standing To Challenge Statute cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Parrish v. State, 760 So. 2d 160 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), wherein the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified conflict with the Second District’s decision in Thompson v. State, 708 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), approved, 750 So. 2d 643 (Fla.1999), on the issue of standing to challenge chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, as violative of the single subject rule contained in article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution. We have jurisdiction. See Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Based on our decision in Salters v. State, 758 So. 2d 667 (Fla.2000), and the State’s confession of error, we quash the decision below to the extent that it is inconsistent with Salters, and remand to the district court for reconsideration in light of our opinions in Salters and State v. Thompson, 750 So. 2d 643 (Fla.1999).
It is so ordered.
SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., ' concur. WELLS, C.J., dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Parrish v. State, 789 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…n appeal, he challenged his violent career criminal sentence, arguing that chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida (1995), violated the single subject requirement of the Florida Constitution. In Parrish v. State, 760 So. 2d 160 (Fla. 4th DCA), quashed by, 788 So. 2d 246 (Fla.2001), we affirmed Parrish’s convictions. On rehearing, we granted Parrish’s motion to certify conflict with Thompson v. State, 708 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA), approved in part by 750 So. 2d 643 (Fla.1999), on the constitutional issue. The Florid…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- State v. Thompson, 750 So. 2d 643 (Fla. 1999)
- Thompson v. State, 708 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)
- Salters v. State, 758 So. 2d 667 (Fla. 2000)
- Parrish v. State, 760 So. 2d 160 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)